View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|15103||Bug reports||Survey editing||public||2019-08-04 12:16||2020-12-28 12:35|
|Summary||15103: No menu link to organize|
|Description||To reorder question and group : we have organize.|
Really great system for reording clearly.
It seems to work on 4.0, but not in default menu ?
|Steps To Reproduce||Reset menus entry|
Search for organize link
Go to a survey, and replace link with admin/survey/sa/organize/surveyid/XXXX
|Complete LimeSurvey version number (& build)||4.0.0 github|
|I will donate to the project if issue is resolved||No|
|Database & DB-Version||not relevant?|
|Server OS (if known)||not relevant ?|
|Webserver software & version (if known)||not relevant ?|
|PHP Version||not relevant ?|
This view is deprecated and will be removed in LS4. (A lot of restructuring and rewriting the JS would be necessary, due to deprecated or unmaintained dependencies)
We will add a lock option for the strucutre panel.
> will be removed in LS4.
It's a really needed and **a lot of used** view …
|Lock option is implemented. So can we close this task now?|
? I don't understand ? I pull this morning, reset menu entries : the organize menu still not in Menu
If you mean the question organizer at Structure tab : no it's really not the same think … did you ever try it to use with 10 groups with 15 question inside each group : tally unusuable …
I mean the organize page, maybe redo it in modules is a great idea. But i really think it's a **needed** modules
I need a slution with random group management : https://gitlab.com/SondagesPro/coreAndTools/organizeSurvey
But still : in my opinion : it's really a better feature than the ordering on the structure part …
|@cdorin What should we do with this ticket?|
|Will suspend the discussion. We will need to discuss an alternative next year (sorry Denis)|
|This is a regression. Should be fixed.|
|I agree, the full-screen organizer is far easier to use.|
|This regression was mentioned by some users/customers now that LS 4 was released. The old question/group ordering tool was very useful, used a lot and should definitely be re-added!|
@ Partner's : **Why** you don't do test when 4 was on Release Candidate ?
I report this issue on 4.0.0-RC2 , only Markus answer. No other Partner repott issue ...
I see some issue from @holch or @jelo during Release candidate ... but none for "Partner" .
Report such issue month after it was deleted/removed make more work for dev ... **You** must be some of user improving GUI , asking for new system, asking to not remove some system ... etc ...
|@DenisChenu: Err...I'm not sure why you are yelling at me - I submitted many bug reports while 4.x was in RC.|
Put the link to 14977
Because see the See-where-he-his-4-sreens-after.png file ... \o/
|@tpartner: I came here because I wanted to know if he is referring to you. I don't think so. I think the "partner" is referring to Mazi's "Partner" tag.|
I mean Partner's
Sorry Tony, then ...
|My last name sucks :)|
@DenisChenu, as far as I am concerned: Yes, I did not test the RC versions a lot for the simple reason that I have lots of other stuff to do and I was the one who yelled loudest "Don't release LS 4 yet." But my voice wasn't heard.
Now I have to work with LS 4 for some projects since first customers start using it and similar to @tpartner I am continuously reporting bugs, see https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view_all_set.php?type=1&temporary=y&reporter_id=774&hide_status=90
|Maybe i'm just angry to see the Ergonomy regression in 4.X ....|
|Me too. There was a GUI design expert hired but instead of letting him improve the LS 4 UI he seems to be working on some website stuff. Why...?|
|@cdorin, can you assign this ticket and include it at the next sprint?|
> Me too. There was a GUI design expert hired but instead of letting him improve the LS 4 UI he seems to be working on some website stuff. Why...?
Our UX guy Robert is hired fulltime now. Expect more "proper" design in the future. :)
https://gitlab.com/SondagesPro/coreAndTools/organizeSurvey can be in core if needed .
Just need an option for managing random or not inside. Not difficult
This really is a major issue. A core feature was simply removed... why?
When can we expect this must-have feature to be available again?
> This really is a major issue. A core feature was simply removed... why?
> When can we expect this must-have feature to be available again?
Maybe we can schedule it for next sprint?
|Fixed in 4.4.0 RC1|
|2019-08-04 12:16||DenisChenu||New Issue|
|2019-08-04 12:16||DenisChenu||File Added: Capture d’écran du 2019-08-04 12-14-29.png|
|2019-08-05 14:08||cdorin||Assigned To||=> p_teichmann|
|2019-08-05 14:08||cdorin||Status||new => assigned|
|2019-09-09 10:28||c_schmitz||Priority||none => urgent|
|2019-09-09 10:29||c_schmitz||Assigned To||p_teichmann =>|
|2019-09-09 10:29||c_schmitz||Status||assigned => new|
|2019-09-09 10:42||c_schmitz||Tag Attached: sprint|
||Note Added: 53529|
|2019-09-09 14:40||DenisChenu||Note Added: 53530|
|2019-09-10 11:41||JHoeck||Assigned To||=> JHoeck|
|2019-09-10 11:41||JHoeck||Status||new => assigned|
|2019-09-18 11:47||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 15299|
|2019-09-20 09:54||JHoeck||Status||assigned => feedback|
|2019-09-20 09:54||JHoeck||Note Added: 53661|
|2019-09-20 10:50||DenisChenu||File Added: UNusuableorganizer.png|
|2019-09-20 10:50||DenisChenu||File Added: usuableorganizer.png|
|2019-09-20 10:50||DenisChenu||Note Added: 53662|
|2019-09-20 10:50||DenisChenu||Status||feedback => assigned|
|2019-11-01 17:25||c_schmitz||Category||Survey design => Survey editing|
|2019-11-07 12:22||DenisChenu||Note Added: 54461|
|2019-11-18 10:29||JHoeck||Note Added: 54641|
|2019-11-28 15:05||cdorin||Status||assigned => closed|
|2019-11-28 15:05||cdorin||Resolution||open => suspended|
|2019-11-28 15:05||cdorin||Note Added: 54871|
|2020-02-11 15:05||ollehar||Status||closed => feedback|
|2020-02-11 15:05||ollehar||Resolution||suspended => reopened|
|2020-02-11 15:05||ollehar||Assigned To||JHoeck =>|
|2020-02-11 15:05||ollehar||Status||feedback => new|
|2020-02-11 15:06||ollehar||Note Added: 55863|
|2020-02-11 15:06||ollehar||Severity||minor => partial_block|
|2020-02-11 15:08||ollehar||Target Version||=> 4.0.x|
|2020-02-11 15:09||tpartner||Note Added: 55864|
|2020-02-13 15:07||Mazi||Note Added: 55957|
|2020-02-13 15:21||DenisChenu||Note Added: 55958|
|2020-02-13 15:43||tpartner||Note Added: 55959|
|2020-02-13 15:48||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 14977|
|2020-02-13 15:49||DenisChenu||Note Added: 55962|
|2020-02-13 15:58||holch||Note Added: 55965|
|2020-02-13 16:01||DenisChenu||Note Added: 55967|
|2020-02-13 16:15||tpartner||Note Added: 55974|
|2020-02-13 17:06||DenisChenu||Note Added: 55979|
|2020-02-13 18:07||Mazi||Note Added: 55983|
|2020-02-13 19:18||DenisChenu||Note Added: 55986|
|2020-02-14 09:24||Mazi||Note Added: 55995|
|2020-02-14 09:29||Mazi||Note Added: 55996|
|2020-02-14 10:53||ollehar||Note Added: 56000|
|2020-02-14 13:38||holch||Note Added: 56018|
|2020-02-22 20:12||cdorin||Priority||urgent => high|
|2020-02-22 20:12||cdorin||Status||new => confirmed|
|2020-05-19 10:38||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 16303|
|2020-05-19 10:39||DenisChenu||Note Added: 57900|
|2020-05-19 14:40||Mazi||Note Added: 57928|
|2020-05-19 16:08||ollehar||Note Added: 57937|
|2020-12-28 12:35||cdorin||Status||confirmed => closed|
|2020-12-28 12:35||cdorin||Note Added: 61207|