<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--RSS generated by Flaimo.com RSS Builder [2026-07-10 06:35:05]-->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"><channel><docs>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/</docs><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/</link><description><![CDATA[LimeSurvey bugs and feature requests - Issues]]></description><title>LimeSurvey bugs and feature requests - Issues</title><language>en</language><category>All Projects</category><ttl>10</ttl><dc:language>en</dc:language><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item><title>20600: When try to create dummy participant : page must be reloaded</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20600</link><description><![CDATA[When try to create dummy participant, if you don't reload the page, no action is done when you clickthe 1st time &lt;br /&gt;
This happen with mandatory attribute.]]></description><category>Usability/user experience</category><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 19:44:35 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20600</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20600#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20599: When questions have a relevance equation, mandatory questions are not enforced.</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20599</link><description><![CDATA[I am seeing issues in a survey, where I have mandatory questions, and I am able to move forward without answering them&lt;br /&gt;
The issue seems to happen when questions have a relevance equation... that seems to kill the enforcement of mandatory questions.&lt;br /&gt;
When the questions don't have relevance equations, the mandatory rule is enforced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This happens on v6 and v7]]></description><category>Survey taking</category><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:57:18 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20599</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20599#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20598: Token overwrite when opening multiple survey tokens in different tabs of the same browser</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20598</link><description><![CDATA[When a user opens two distinct token links for the same survey in two different tabs of the same browser session, LimeSurvey overwrites the active token session data with the most recently loaded one. If the user goes back to the first tab and tries to save or proceed, the response data gets cross-contaminated or associated with the second token.]]></description><category>Survey participants (Tokens)</category><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:35:34 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20598</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20598#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20596: Panel-Integration parameter (Survey-URL-Parameter) missing after copy</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20596</link><description><![CDATA[When I copy a survey, the panel integration parameters are missing in the result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When using export / import to &quot;copy&quot; a survey, the panel integration parameters are not missing.]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:03:52 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20596</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20596#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20595: Printable Survey not showing "other", after importing via txt</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20595</link><description><![CDATA[After importing a Survey via txt the &quot;export&quot; -&gt; &quot;Printable Survey&quot; view does not show any other fields.&lt;br /&gt;
A workaround for this is: After importing open every question containing an other field, then saving the question (without any changes).&lt;br /&gt;
It seems as if saving the questions changes some parameter in the background, which is necessary for the Printable survey view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also it seems that the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
   only occurs on txt import&lt;br /&gt;
   applies to all question that have a built in other field option&lt;br /&gt;
   is unaffected by other position and custom text]]></description><category>Import/Export</category><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:03:24 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20595</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20595#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20594: It is not possible to delete answer options/subquestions after upgrading to 7.0.4+260620</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20594</link><description><![CDATA[After upgrading to LimeSurvey 7.0.4+260620 via Comfort Update, answer options can be created but cannot be deleted. The issue appears to affect all question types with answer options and subquestions.]]></description><category>Question editor</category><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:52:47 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20594</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20594#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20593: Array filter on single choice don't work anymore</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20593</link><description><![CDATA[The array filter attribute and the array filter exclude attribute didn't work in 7.X]]></description><category>Survey taking</category><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:48:07 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20593</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20593#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20589: Direct link to view single response no longer opens a dedicated page since v7 — only a modal/popup, breaking shareable links</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20589</link><description><![CDATA[## Expected Behavior&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In previous LimeSurvey versions (pre-v7), clicking view/edit on a response opened a dedicated page with its own unique URL, e.g.:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://umfrage.example.tld/responses/view?surveyId=532561&amp;id=280&quot; rel=&quot;noopener,nofollow&quot;&gt;https://umfrage.example.tld/responses/view?surveyId=532561&amp;id=280&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This URL was directly shareable, colleagues or reviewers could be sent a link straight to a specific response without needing to log in, navigate to the survey, and manually search for the response ID.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
## Problem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Old-style direct links (responses/view?surveyId=X&amp;id=Y) still resolve to a working page (confirmed on our instance), but this is no longer reachable from the UI itself.&lt;br /&gt;
* The response list now only supports a popup for viewing/editing individual responses, and popups cannot be bookmarked, linked, or shared via URL.&lt;br /&gt;
* This breaks existing workflows for teams that share direct links to specific responses (e.g. for QA, moderation, or cross-referencing with partners).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
## Suggested Fix&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Restore the option to open a response in its own dedicated page (either as default behavior or as a user-selectable alternative to the popup), so the URL updates to reflect the currently viewed response and can be copied/shared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively: make the popup update the browser URL (e.g. via history.pushState) so the current response state is reflected in a shareable link, similar to how many modern SPA implementations preserve deep-linkability even inside modals.]]></description><category>Response browsing</category><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:24:01 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20589</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20589#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20588: Error while import participants for csv file</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20588</link><description><![CDATA[Error while import participants for csv file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Invalid access codes skipped when the token field is filled in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tid,firstname,lastname,email,emailstatus,token,language,validfrom,validuntil,invited,reminded,remindercount,completed,usesleft&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;1&quot;,&quot;first&quot;,&quot;last&quot;,&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:first.last@gmail.com&quot;&gt;first.last@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;&quot;,&quot;OK&quot;,&quot;DIOnqyPDjZJPDws&quot;,&quot;pl&quot;,&quot;&quot;,&quot;&quot;,&quot;N&quot;,&quot;N&quot;,&quot;0&quot;,&quot;N&quot;,&quot;1&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the token field is empty import executes successfully.]]></description><category>Survey participants (Tokens)</category><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 10:28:10 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20588</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20588#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20587: Error participant token while editing</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20587</link><description><![CDATA[Error participant token while editing&lt;br /&gt;
Empty token value after editing survey participant]]></description><category>Survey participants (Tokens)</category><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:58:54 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20587</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20587#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20586: Unabole to use installer GUI whith nginx or IIS</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20586</link><description><![CDATA[When trying to install a v7 version with a not configured nginx for url rewriting, redirection is /index.php/installer goes to a 404]]></description><category>Installation</category><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:06 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20586</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20586#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20585: New editor throws error - 404 could not resolve request editor</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20585</link><description><![CDATA[In a fresh install of limesurvey 7.0.5 I can create and edit a survey with the classic editor. As soon as I switch to the new editor I can neither edit an existing survey nor create a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 To be more specific, when i try to create a new survey a survey is created but the redirect to the edit view of this new survey instantly throws an error.]]></description><category>Question editor</category><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:20:13 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20585</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20585#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20582: Several deprecation errors when using version 7.0.5 with PHP 8.4</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20582</link><description><![CDATA[I had to modify several files in order to get rid of a deprecation message:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  DI\autowire(): Implicitly marking parameter $className as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/php-di/php-di/src/functions.php on line 48&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  DI\create(): Implicitly marking parameter $className as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/php-di/php-di/src/functions.php on line 35&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  GoldSpecDigital\ObjectOrientedOAS\Objects\Schema::boolean(): Implicitly marking parameter $objectId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/goldspecdigital/oooas/src/Objects/Schema.php on line 232&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  GoldSpecDigital\ObjectOrientedOAS\Objects\Schema::integer(): Implicitly marking parameter $objectId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/goldspecdigital/oooas/src/Objects/Schema.php on line 241&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  GoldSpecDigital\ObjectOrientedOAS\Objects\Schema::number(): Implicitly marking parameter $objectId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/goldspecdigital/oooas/src/Objects/Schema.php on line 250&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  GoldSpecDigital\ObjectOrientedOAS\Objects\Schema::object(): Implicitly marking parameter $objectId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/goldspecdigital/oooas/src/Objects/Schema.php on line 259&lt;br /&gt;
 PHP Deprecated:  GoldSpecDigital\ObjectOrientedOAS\Objects\Schema::string(): Implicitly marking parameter $objectId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /var/www/vhosts/wordpress/htdocs/umfrage.dgb-bildungswerk.de/vendor/goldspecdigital/oooas/src/Objects/Schema.php on line 268&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Proxy/ProxyFactory.php&lt;br /&gt;
43c43&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function __construct(bool $writeProxiesToFile = false, ?string $proxyDirectory = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function __construct(bool $writeProxiesToFile = false, string $proxyDirectory = null)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Helper/CreateDefinitionHelper.php&lt;br /&gt;
56c56&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function __construct(?string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function __construct(string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Resolver/ParameterResolver.php&lt;br /&gt;
39,40c39,40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;         ?MethodInjection $definition = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;         ?ReflectionMethod $method = null,&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;         MethodInjection $definition = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;         ReflectionMethod $method = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Resolver/ObjectCreator.php&lt;br /&gt;
212c212&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public static function setPrivatePropertyValue(?string $className, $object, string $propertyName, $propertyValue)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public static function setPrivatePropertyValue(string $className = null, $object, string $propertyName, $propertyValue)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Source/DefinitionArray.php&lt;br /&gt;
39c39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function __construct(array $definitions = [], ?Autowiring $autowiring = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function __construct(array $definitions = [], Autowiring $autowiring = null)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Source/Autowiring.php&lt;br /&gt;
23c23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function autowire(string $name, ?ObjectDefinition $definition = null);&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function autowire(string $name, ObjectDefinition $definition = null);&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Source/DefinitionNormalizer.php&lt;br /&gt;
46c46&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function normalizeRootDefinition($definition, string $name, ?array $wildcardsReplacements = null) : Definition&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function normalizeRootDefinition($definition, string $name, array $wildcardsReplacements = null) : Definition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/Source/AnnotationBasedAutowiring.php&lt;br /&gt;
56c56&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function autowire(string $name, ?ObjectDefinition $definition = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function autowire(string $name, ObjectDefinition $definition = null)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Definition/ObjectDefinition.php&lt;br /&gt;
72c72&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function __construct(string $name, ?string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function __construct(string $name, string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
88c88&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function setClassName(?string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function setClassName(string $className = null)&lt;br /&gt;
186c186&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function setLazy(?bool $lazy = null)&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function setLazy(bool $lazy = null)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/Container.php&lt;br /&gt;
98,100c98,100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;         ?MutableDefinitionSource $definitionSource = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;         ?ProxyFactory $proxyFactory = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;         ?ContainerInterface $wrapperContainer = null&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;         MutableDefinitionSource $definitionSource = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;         ProxyFactory $proxyFactory = null,&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;         ContainerInterface $wrapperContainer = null&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
./vendor/php-di/php-di/src/ContainerBuilder.php&lt;br /&gt;
283c283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function writeProxiesToFile(bool $writeToFile, ?string $proxyDirectory = null) : self&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function writeProxiesToFile(bool $writeToFile, string $proxyDirectory = null) : self]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:27:08 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20582</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20582#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20581: application/controllers/ResponsesController.php crashes (due to php 8.4)</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20581</link><description><![CDATA[The display of responses generates a php error: &lt;br /&gt;
ResponsesController::actionDeleteAttachments(): Implicitly marking parameter $responseId as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead&lt;br /&gt;
/srv/www/formulaire.unige.ch/html_root/outils/limeemploi/application/controllers/ResponsesController.php(808)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've patched it adding a &quot;?&quot; before the second &quot;int&quot; on line 808:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
diff ResponsesController.php.00 ResponsesController.php&lt;br /&gt;
808c808&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;     public function actionDeleteAttachments(int $surveyId, int $responseId = null): void&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;     public function actionDeleteAttachments(int $surveyId, ?int $responseId = null): void&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've checked, the error is still in v  6.17.10]]></description><category>Response browsing</category><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:48:43 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20581</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20581#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20580: "Bootstrap buttons” layout does not display the input field when the built-in “Other” option is selected</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20580</link><description><![CDATA[In LimeSurvey 7.0.5, a multiple-choice question configured with the “Bootstrap buttons” question theme does not display the text input associated with the built-in “Other” option.&lt;br /&gt;
The “Other” button can be selected, but no text field becomes visible, so the participant cannot enter an additional answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspection of the generated HTML shows that the text input is present:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;mb-3 text-item other-text-item form-check&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    Other:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;input&lt;br /&gt;
        class=&quot;form-control input-sm bootstrap-other-input&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        type=&quot;text&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        name=&quot;Q16564_Cother&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        id=&quot;answerQ16564other&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        value=&quot;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        aria-labelledby=&quot;label--other&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
        data-name=&quot;Q16564other&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hidden field is also generated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;input&lt;br /&gt;
    type=&quot;hidden&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    name=&quot;javaQ16564_Cother&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    id=&quot;javaQ16564_Cother&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    value=&quot;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    class=&quot;button-checkbox-other-value&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
    data-name=&quot;Q16564_Cother&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The visible text input therefore exists in the DOM, but its containing element remains hidden after the “Other” button is selected.]]></description><category>Survey taking</category><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:29:58 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20580</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20580#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20579: Statistics can't be exported</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20579</link><description><![CDATA[When trying to export a surveys statistics, while having the output option 'Show text responses inline: on', 'View summary of all available fields: on' and 'Show graphs: on' selected, the statistics can't be esported as an excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
The file will be created but it will show an error in the actual file and no data. Furthermore, when using HTML for the output, the answers to the text responses won't be displayed.]]></description><category>Statistics</category><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 14:21:45 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20579</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20579#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20578: Survey activation fails when a survey contains a Ranking question due to a consistency check error indicating missing answer opt</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20578</link><description><![CDATA[Activating a survey containing a Ranking question triggers a consistency check error stating that the question has missing answer options, preventing the survey from being activated.]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:09:37 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20578</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20578#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20576: Partial Scoring for Multiple Choice Questions</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20576</link><description><![CDATA[Currently, LimeSurvey calculates the score for Multiple Choice questions by summing the assessment values of all selected answer options. As a result, it is not possible to implement a scoring model that is commonly used in knowledge and competency tests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many tests, only correctly selected answers should contribute to the score, while incorrectly selected answers should neither receive points nor cause a penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This behavior cannot currently be achieved using the standard Assessment feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If incorrect answers are assigned an assessment value of 0, participants can simply select all answer options and still receive the maximum score. Assigning negative values to incorrect answers introduces a penalty-based scoring system, which is not appropriate for many assessment scenarios.]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:35:03 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20576</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20576#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20574: Unable to update with not compatible theme</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20574</link><description><![CDATA[This DB didn't update&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely default theme ? Or Global default theme ?]]></description><category>_ Unknown</category><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:08:59 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20574</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20574#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20573: Database : ranking question contains unrelated information</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20573</link><description><![CDATA[In 7.X database contains the question ID and subquestion ID&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But data are related to other subquestion ID]]></description><category>_ Unknown</category><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:21:21 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20573</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20573#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20572: Can not add new element to ranking question in 7.0</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20572</link><description><![CDATA[In 6.0 : we can add element in ranking quetsion after activation, not tru in 7.0]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:58:03 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20572</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20572#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20571: Usage of max_subquestions rankking feature broken</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20571</link><description><![CDATA[We have max_subquestions where we can put a max column number for ranking question. &lt;br /&gt;
In 7.0 this setting is not respected.]]></description><category>Survey editing</category><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:06:42 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20571</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20571#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20570: When not unchecking the "unseen or not answered" checkbox but editing a data set the screen freezes on save</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20570</link><description><![CDATA[Sometimes you need to adjust existing answers to add further details. When doing so at a lengthy survey, you sometimes forget to uncheck the &quot;unseen or not answered&quot; checkbox. In this case, the screen simply freezes on save and all edits get lost.]]></description><category>Data Entry (non public)</category><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:45:25 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20570</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20570#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20569: Invalid quartile for crypted data</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20569</link><description><![CDATA[If data is crypted : quartile of numeric question are false]]></description><category>Statistics</category><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:48:52 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20569</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20569#bugnotes</comments></item><item><title>20568: Implicit conversion from float 0.5 to int loses precision</title><author></author><link>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20568</link><description><![CDATA[With crypted attribute , when try to get quartile, we cast as float, not if not crypted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. No reason of cast if we do not cast when not crypted (must cast as both)&lt;br /&gt;
2. Throw an error with debug set]]></description><category>Statistics</category><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:43:02 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20568</guid><comments>https://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=20568#bugnotes</comments></item></channel></rss>
