View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|11988||Feature requests||[All Projects] Survey design||public||2016-12-07 15:15||2018-03-09 18:59|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||11988: Allow order of answers and sub question in 'the way admin user want'|
The i thinbk we need a global way, not 5 attributes again.
We already have: order alphabetic, order random
The way to fix have a specific order can be : order by list (code separated by comma for example).
I just don't see how to fix 'randome with fixed part', but maybe: list like tis (if there are 5 answers + other)
list : ',,,-oth-,end'.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|related to||07367||assigned||LouisGac||Feature requests||"Other answer" at a certain position in the list|
|related to||07498||closed||DenisChenu||Feature requests||Sometimes for some survey we need specific order for a people|
|related to||13427||new||Bug reports||Get order from previous question - Array (Numbers) - not working?|
Bring the advanced options into the sub-questions GUI.
The attached screenshot shows an example of approached by a different web based survey-tool.
To exclude a sub-question from the random order you can click the red pin.
The sub-question can be grouped and relevance and randomize/static can be applied to the subgroup of sub-questions as well.
The current technical debt of the codebase might prevent going in that direction. But the ticket seems to propose a bigger change to get rid of technical debt.
And : for order by TOKEN:ATTRIBUTE for example ?
One day LS GmbH will start from scratch with a stripped down version of LS since complexity and technical debt got unbearable.
You started this ticket to discuss code change. I provided a small perspective from the GUI side.
Personally I would favor a Listobject for items/subquestions, which can be manipulated via EM. (Current EM codebase is the blackhole. Who will touch it?)
The dynamic and static lists would be able to contain order as well.
Order by TOKEN:ATTRIBUTE is this feature request?
Good catch for 07498 :)
About SortBy function, i'm sure we have a Feature Request about 'arrtay management by EM' :)
Here, it's more a SortBy([1,2,6,-oth-,3]) for example .
But : the system must do
|2016-12-07 15:15||DenisChenu||New Issue|
|2016-12-07 16:18||jelo||Note Added: 42456|
|2016-12-07 17:24||DenisChenu||Note Added: 42461|
|2016-12-07 20:39||jelo||Note Added: 42466|
|2016-12-08 08:46||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 07498|
|2016-12-08 08:50||DenisChenu||Note Added: 42467|
|2016-12-08 08:50||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 07367|
|2018-03-09 18:59||DenisChenu||Relationship added||related to 13427|