| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14652 | Bug reports | Other | public | 2019-03-15 11:29 | 2019-05-06 10:57 |
| Reporter | cdorin | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | high | Severity | partial_block | ||
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 3.16.x | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 3.17.x | ||||
| Summary | 14652: Quota system is buggy if you allow users to edit | ||||
| Description | Create a quota. Import the attached survey. Click yes or no. You are "quota-outed". But, you have the possibility to "Submit". Once you click on it, you are redirected to an empty page, and from there, to the end page. In the past, there was no submit button. Please note that if you click on submit and then on next, your answer will appear in the response table as being "complete", the user landing successfully of the end page (this is not supposed to happen). For normal behaviour, export my second .lsa into your LS2 installation. | ||||
| Additional Information | Please note that all the themes from LS3 behave in the same manner. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Bug heat | 14 | ||||
| Complete LimeSurvey version number (& build) | irrelevant | ||||
| I will donate to the project if issue is resolved | No | ||||
| Browser | |||||
| Database type & version | irrelevant | ||||
| Server OS (if known) | |||||
| Webserver software & version (if known) | |||||
| PHP Version | irrelevant | ||||
 |
@DenisChenu, any thoughts on this? I think that the behaviour from LimeSurvey 2.73 is the default one (maybe you know better how it was in the past) |
 |
In 2.6lts : you can only go to previous and not submit. I think allowing «Previous» and «Confirm» (maybe default button must be renamed in quota) is a good solution but : it must work
|
|
|
@DenisChenu, I talked to We propose to go back to the behaviour of 2.6lts (no submit button). While we do agree with your proposed solution, we got some users reporting this oddly behaviour and we need smth at the moment that does not require too much tweaking. But your idea should be taken into account when ((if!)) the quota system will be rewritten in the features. |
|
|
In 4.0 then ? New feature for 4.0 or up ? |
|
|
I can't provide any ETA. Will do my best to push it given the fact that it is a nice idea + it's a nice survey behaviour proposal. |
|
|
No ETA : move this to Feature request without target :). Mean 4.0 and up ;) I have some since 2.6lts that come for 4.0 |
|
|
Hey I will create a feature request with the proposal from @DenisChenu. |
 |
https://github.com/LimeSurvey/LimeSurvey/commit/9e678fb1cf66e13402acca1bdb18f416477657c0 |
 |
Fix committed to master branch: http://bugs.limesurvey.org/plugin.php?page=Source/view&id=28864 |
|
|
Fixed in Version 3.1.7.3 |
