View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12088 | Feature requests | Survey taking | public | 2017-01-27 13:52 | 2021-03-07 21:55 |
Reporter | jelo | Assigned To | |||
Priority | none | Severity | feature | ||
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
Fixed in Version | 4.0.0-RC2 | ||||
Summary | 12088: Semi-mandatory question (requesting answer instead of enforcing it) | ||||
Description | Beside optional and mandatory questions the semi-mandatory questions remind respondents that they missed a question without requiring that they go back and answer it. | ||||
Additional Information |
https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/design-issues/108216-add-button-in-a-popup-for-mandatory-questions | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Bug heat | 10 | ||||
Story point estimate | |||||
Users affected % | |||||
related to | 14560 | closed | Bug reports | Mandatory soft must be related to Question not Page |
And : what did we put in this question ? Semi mandatory is something like For an easiest way : https://framagit.org/SondagePro-LimeSurvey-plugin/checkboxForText |
|
I won't challenge your statement "Can already be done". The wording semi-mandatory is not correct in a logic sense. I would call it answer handling/validation. The three states are:
I don't use that feature, but I see demand from others. That's why I posted this feature request. |
|
For single choice :
ALl other solution :
I think a solution with user who complain "it don't work in such situation" must not be included in core. And here : all situation i found with 'extra question/extra button' are solution where 'It don't work in such situation' :) |
|
The users will decide if your way is good enough in terms of time and user experience. LS GmbH wants to position LS as a SurveyMonkey competitor. Offering your workaround vs. a option to click will be interesting to compare in amount of time and hassle when the survey has more than a few questions. Not sure if they share the "clean and understandable". Beside that I have to remark that a feature request shouldn't be answered with workarounds. If that is the standard we would have never seen a expiry date with surveys. The workaround would be "set a alarm clock and then login and click stop". Same result, but different amount of effort for the survey administrator. |
|
Surveygizmo offers this and it is one of the features I miss after moving across. It works as an option much like the mandatory option. If a respondent misses a question it pops up saying 'it looks like you missed a question (highlighted). If you don't want to answer that is OK (just click next again), but we would appreciate it if you provided a response." |
|
Already in 4.0 |
|
This feature is already implemented in LS version 4, not going to be done in LS version 3. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2017-01-27 13:52 | jelo | New Issue | |
2017-01-27 18:34 | DenisChenu | Note Added: 42853 | |
2017-01-27 19:58 | jelo | Note Added: 42856 | |
2017-01-27 22:03 | DenisChenu | Note Added: 42857 | |
2017-01-28 12:21 | jelo | Note Added: 42859 | |
2019-08-06 01:56 | tixeon | Note Added: 53117 | |
2019-08-06 08:29 | DenisChenu | Assigned To | => dominikvitt |
2019-08-06 08:29 | DenisChenu | Status | new => assigned |
2019-08-06 08:29 | DenisChenu | Relationship added | related to 14560 |
2019-08-06 08:32 | DenisChenu | Note Added: 53120 | |
2019-08-06 10:08 |
|
Status | assigned => resolved |
2019-08-06 10:08 |
|
Resolution | open => no change required |
2019-08-06 10:08 |
|
Fixed in Version | => 4.0.0-RC2 |
2019-08-06 10:08 |
|
Note Added: 53122 | |
2020-10-14 04:47 | adamzammit | Issue Monitored: adamzammit | |
2021-03-07 21:55 | c_schmitz | Status | resolved => closed |
2021-08-02 22:55 | guest | Bug heat | 8 => 10 |