View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|13647||Bug reports||Survey editing||public||2018-05-03 19:49||2021-02-08 13:39|
|Summary||13647: Different approaches of creating subquestions and answer options with different Array type questions|
When creating an array question you have different screens for creating sub questions and answer options. there is also no relevance equation for answer options.
If you create an Array number question, both sub questions and answer options are created in the same screen (x and y axis) and there is a relevance equation field for both axis.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|Complete LimeSurvey version number (& build)||Version 3.7.1+180424|
|I will donate to the project if issue is resolved||No|
|Database type & version||MySQL|
|Server OS (if known)||Linux (Cpanel)|
|Webserver software & version (if known)||Apache|
dominik: for when we'll convert to twig the subquestion editing
this has been "fixed" by removing the field right?
Relevance field was removed only for "Array by column" question type, not for others.
The intention was to remove it on a few others questions types as well.
But more important would be to have a plan to get answer relevance everywhere.
This thing is hunting us through the years. I wonder how many open bugreports are just that topic.
«Array number question, both sub questions and answer » false
In array number : all are subquestion … currently, more : each subquestion (column in DB) have 2 params : subQ X and SubQ Y
Shall I have this ticket closed?
Having relevance equation for answer options is in our backlog.
You close it, it gets forgotten. Backlog is like the "runde Ablage" (just ask the German colleagues what that is). ;-)
Fair poitn , though it s in our backlog, @holch, I guarantee you that ;)
|2018-05-03 19:49||holch||New Issue|
|2018-05-03 19:49||holch||File Added: Screenshot_11.png|
|2018-05-03 19:49||holch||File Added: Screenshot_12.png|
|2018-05-03 19:49||holch||File Added: Screenshot_13.png|
|2018-05-03 19:49||holch||File Added: Screenshot_14.png|
||Assigned To||=> ollehar|
||Status||new => assigned|
||Assigned To||ollehar => LouisGac|
||Assigned To||LouisGac => dominikvitt|
||Note Added: 47618|
||Note Added: 48894|
||Priority||none => immediate|
||Note Added: 48935|
|2018-09-20 18:08||jelo||Note Added: 49106|
|2018-09-20 18:09||jelo||Relationship added||related to 09941|
|2018-09-28 10:40||DenisChenu||Note Added: 49161|
||Assigned To||dominikvitt => cdorin|
|2019-09-08 18:35||cdorin||Assigned To||cdorin => LimeBot|
|2019-11-01 17:25||c_schmitz||Category||Survey design => Survey editing|
|2020-03-04 17:10||cdorin||Assigned To||LimeBot => cdorin|
|2020-03-04 17:10||cdorin||Status||assigned => feedback|
|2021-02-04 10:15||cdorin||Status||feedback => new|
|2021-02-08 13:05||cdorin||Note Added: 61999|
|2021-02-08 13:05||cdorin||Assigned To||cdorin =>|
|2021-02-08 13:05||cdorin||Status||new => feedback|
|2021-02-08 13:38||holch||Note Added: 62010|
|2021-02-08 13:38||holch||Status||feedback => new|
|2021-02-08 13:39||cdorin||Note Added: 62011|
|2021-02-08 13:39||cdorin||Priority||immediate => normal|
|2021-02-08 13:39||cdorin||Status||new => acknowledged|