Back to the future. Still a valid feature request today.

https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/future-features/104115-visual-groups-pages-and-logical-groups-of-questions

So no response, no notification, no discussion sins 2014.
Here another example why this is relevant: https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/can-i-do-this-with-limesurvey/115093-connect-multiple-randomized-question-groups

that bring us to an architecture in the Joomla style:

Article / Groups of Articles / Pages

I love it, but most people doesn't understand it.
So, I'd say we could do it when we'll have a simple wisiwyg editor for new commers.

Best solution : rename "Group" to Page … in fact : our group are Page …

Best solution : rename "Group" to Page … in fact : our group are Page …

Then you are missing a logical group. Because a question group is something about the logic of the survey and a page is about how it is presented. In my opinion, these are two different things.

I might want to have 5 questions in one logical group, but I might want them on different "pages".

Sometimes you need to group questions logically into one "question group", but you still want them in different "pages". Not possible at the moment. You need to decide either for a logical grouping or for a layout based grouping.

Then you are missing a logical group.

Maybe but : for Expression Manager : Group is step (in group by group mode) : then OUR group are page.

Seems more a feature like this

1. Rename current group to page
2. Create a logical group for question
3. Show (new) group in Survey structure (and not page like currently)
4. See what to do with organizer

https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/design-issues/120373-grouping-questions-within-a-question-group#194921

https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/can-i-do-this-with-limesurvey/120785-random-groups-but-force-two-groups-to-occure-together

For information : all group and question randomization system can be moved in plugin now (4.X)

@holch : again : i didn' think the forum post can be realted totally to this topic. Can help, but not the only solution ....

@Denis: I think if we have a separation of 'page' and 'group' the problem in the forum could be solved quickly, see my graphics in the post.

I agree that it might not be the only approach to tackle the issue about the random groups, but it would be one option to solve it. I don't see what more we would need than the possibility to create pages independently from question groups to solve the "random groups" problem from the link above.

https://www.limesurvey.org/forum/can-i-do-this-with-limesurvey/120845-how-to-filter-the-list-of-questions-based-on-user-selection#197059

The capability to display multiple groups in a page is a much needed feature - please add it. Thank you.

I agree with lintu, we also crave this feature. When "pages" become independent of "question groups" we could design real good studies with direct feedback!

+1 this is very major flaws in flexibility of survey design!! my reasons -> https://forums.limesurvey.org/forum/can-i-do-this-with-limesurvey/121540-randomization-and-question-by-question#201157
I only have 5 demographic questions..but in 5 pages that is super boring and participants will definitely not even bother complete the survey. I will have to consider not using limesurvey..which is VERY annoying.

It's 2022 and this is still a very good idea... ;-)

Just saying.

I also think this is one of the main flaws in contrast to other survey tools.
Any news on this feature?

Is there a website/newsletter...ANYthing where one can see which feature-requests are ranked how important and/or urgent?
Would be nice to get some transparency and also understand which other features are prioritized and why.

Also I could imagine a lot of public grants out there who would finance such feature development for open source software.
I am happy to help if the developers come around with some numbers (how much money and time is needed?)
Also we could probably easily crowdfund this (especially in the end of the year, many institutes at University still need to get there budget down to Zero $/€ ;)

SureyTheme solution : https://extensions.sondages.pro/themes-and-templates/skelvanilla-a11y-and-usuability/documentation.html#Sub-group-inside-group

Maybe have a StartGroup / Endgroup by question can be OK ?

"SureyTheme solution : https://extensions.sondages.pro/themes-and-templates/skelvanilla-a11y-and-usuability/documentation.html#Sub-group-inside-group"

While it is great to have question subgroups, it is not the same as having a page concept (visual groups) in parallel to question groups (logical groups).

"Maybe have a StartGroup / Endgroup by question can be OK ?"

Not sure what this means.

All in all, I still think the request for a "page" concept in parallel to a "question group" concept is valid and important.